Who's winning? Who is losing?

If there is no loser in a business, there is no winner.

Bestami, have you heard this saying?

Is this really true?

Win win, win win. So what is this word then?

In a win-win situation, if everyone wins, then who is the loser?

***

Can't an order really be established where no one loses?

In fact, if everyone in the country worked and produced something, I think the income we earn as a country would be enough for all of us.

Sometimes there are greedy people and I can't say anything worse, but let me say the naive ones, there are losers because of this. Hence the winners.

If we all earn money only from what we produce, and if we do not risk what we earn in order to earn more, there will be neither many winners nor many losers.

Is this too utopian?

Isn't there such a world?

This is the rule of the world! There will always be winners and losers!

It is not possible for everyone to work, produce, earn profit from what they produce, and not have any losers.

***

Then, actually production requires capital.

Capital means accumulation, but being able to own large capital is not just a matter of saving today and saving some more tomorrow.

Some people say that behind every big money there is either something dirty or theft of labor.

The properly accumulated capital is very little. Maybe it's something that centuries-old families can do with properly acquired capital.

They say that most of those capitals or those fortunes were obtained by standing on someone's shoulders.

Look, I don't know if this statement is true, but I agree that the wealth gained in a short time should be investigated behind it.

Unfortunately, we do not have a law where you got it.

On the contrary, there is a law no matter where you bring it from.

***

Don't misunderstand what I'm saying. It is not possible to become an enemy of capital.

If you really want to create something, this cannot be done without capital.

People all over the world work in the workplaces, factories and companies owned by our business people, and they all earn their living from these companies.

Is it possible to build that car on your own without capital?

Is it possible for you to run that iron and steel factory alone?

Even if you are united and try to do something, after a while that unity either disintegrates because of a conflict of interests, or, well, it is nice if something is done slowly and without being productive enough. Such examples are very few.

In other words, these things cannot happen without a capitalist at the top who will put things in order with the power of his capital when necessary.

In the end, someone wins and someone loses.

This is the order of the day!

***

Let's all produce, let's all win, these things don't happen with win win, win win.

You have to either be the oppressor or the oppressed.

There is no such thing as a fair order, neither oppressor nor oppressed.

This utopian view does not work, it was tried in time and it was seen that it did not work. There is no need to force it anymore.

There is no winner in a business that has no losers!

If you want to win, someone is bound to lose.

This is the law of nature: either you hunt or you are hunted and become hunted.

Hunter? Prey? Which one do you want to be?

If you are not among those eating at the table, you are the food on the table.

Wolves' table, you will take your place at the head of the table in time!

***

For some reason, these came to my mind while the minimum wage negotiations were ongoing.

Will workers be able to get the wages they deserve?

I do not think so.

I hope that the commission will come to a conclusion to everyone's liking.

With love and respect to everyone from Moscow.