How Quantum Theory Works in Politics

Now let's say we held elections this Sunday. 

But we don't know the results yet. Not even an envelope in the ballot boxes has been opened yet. 

In such a scenario, what information do you think we have about the election results at the moment?

Let's say we don't even have a breakdown of those who participated in the election and those who didn't.

First of all, we naturally know which party received how many votes in the previous elections. 

However, since parties that had not participated in the previous elections also participated in this election, we naturally do not have any information about the vote rates of these new parties in the previous election.

Okay, maybe the latest poll results can provide some preliminary insights. But do we know how accurate the polls are? I think the polls will not be that consistent this time. Because the government has scared people a lot with its practices and people don't easily reveal their true opinions. Therefore, I think the margin of error of the polling firms will be quite high in this election.

What else do we know?

We know who promised what. Although we don't know exactly what the opposition is saying yet, I am hopeful that we will find out soon. So we can accept that we know.

We also know what the government has done and what it has failed to do. I don't know how much good it will do for them to open the purse strings at the last minute, but it seems to me that these last ditch efforts will not help much in the election. 

Let's come to the point. At this stage, we can assume that everyone has the election results in a sealed envelope in their pocket. However, since the envelopes have not been opened yet, everyone is in almost the same position.

In other words, we can say that everyone is in an equal position in that brief moment when it is not yet known how much favor each person has received from the voters.

So is there anything different from the plasma position I was talking about at the moment, these days when the elections have not yet taken place? I say the plasma position because the plasma position, as you know, is an intermediate position. It's like being in limbo, neither like this nor like that. 

I actually want to characterize this situation as a quantum state in politics. It is not possible to know the outcome without looking inside the envelope. It could be like this or like that. 

All parties with envelopes in their pockets are more or less in the same position. Because no one knows their vote share yet.

This is the position the parties around the table of six are sitting in. They all have the same power and the same position at the table.

They say that decisions are taken unanimously at the table. If that is the case, even if there is only one party leader who objects when someone says it should be like this, it means that decision cannot be taken at the table.

Honestly, I don't know if this is the right organization, but I can say that it is correct in essence. Because in reality, as I said, everyone is actually in a quantum state. It is not yet clear who will have what vote in the upcoming elections. 

Anyway, does it make a difference if one vote is higher than the other? Okay, we call it democracy, but democracy does not mean that what the majority says will happen. At least I am against the logic that whatever the majority says goes. 

Even if the majority has fewer votes, if they come up with the right proposal, or if their proposal is accepted as reasonable by the other parties, why shouldn't that proposal be accepted?

A contrary proposal will not get approval from the table anyway.

Let's look at it from another angle. Isn't it a problem that the proposal of the one with the higher number of votes can be blocked by the one with the lower number of votes? 

No, I don't think so. It means that the proposal is not accepted by at least some people. That means that someone sees some drawbacks in that proposal. That should be respected.

But in that case, no proper decision can come out of the table. If everyone objects to something, how will a common decision be taken?

This is where the rubber hits the road. 

The Catholics solved this in a different way during the papal elections. It is not possible to leave the room before the decision is taken, that is, before the new pope is elected. They lock themselves in the room and cannot leave until the new pope is elected. No matter how long the election takes.

Of course, everyone will have to make some concessions in the end, but decisions will be taken unanimously. If necessary, something like that can be considered.

I think the table of six is a valuable formation. 

I think today's politics should be quantum politics. This is the magic. As soon as you look inside the envelopes, the magic is broken. 

Let's let the decisions be made at the sextet table as fairly as possible in this system. 

That's why I want to tell those who make such comments to stop saying that the two main parties at that table are. 

The table was set even if it was difficult, don't try to spoil it. It is obvious what the country has become with the method of the government.

Our duty is to protect the table and enjoy the taste of quantum justice.

Love and respect to everyone from Moscow.