Search

politics

Should it be like this today, or different tomorrow?

Candlestick newspaper tactics. For example, the headline says I don't know who is undressed, you see that the weather is very hot, he took off his shawl. Just for the news, asparagas, the point is to draw attention.

Two sides of something

Sometimes there are such events that when you look at one memory, you understand something else, when you look at another memory, something else is understood. If you only see the wrong moment, you get the whole thing wrong. Is it an example? you turned your head in that direction, the man is jumping into the water with his clothes, is this a stupid situation, when you look carefully, a child who can't swim in the water is about to drown, it is understood why the man jumped. If you don't take that second look, the careful look, and turn away, you've placed the man in the category of insane. Actually, you misunderstood.

Maybe it is written that way to be striking. Today, many newspapers have headlines that do not fully comply with the content of the subject, as long as the headline is striking and draws attention. Candlestick newspaper tactics. For example, the headline says I don't know who is undressed, you see that the weather is very hot, he took off his shawl. Just for the news, asparagas, the point is to draw attention.

It turns out that Seda Sayan's Stage News Wasn't Asparagas:

They write again, the beautiful Seda Sayan will go to the concert instead of the banned Melek Mosso. Come on, you're saying from there, it's okay, you think they must have made a striking headline again. Didn't Derya Uluğ and Funda Arar, who were going to the concert together, protest the ban and say that we don't go on stage too? Where did Seda Sayan come from now, and they found two more singers next to her, you are reading the content of the news when you say it must be a joke, you are really surprised that they wrote it right this time. Maybe Seda Sayan has accepted such a thing in order to make a more sensational protest, in fact, you want to say that she is a straight woman and get tired of it. After all, isn't it our point not to react with what is done in the first place, you know that the lady likes the sensation, well, she has a lot of fans, maybe she wanted to give a more effective message to the masses. Maybe she will say how terrible what happened to Melek Mosso instead of going to the concert and singing. Under that faux-blonde look, there is actually a very intelligent personality, he definitely has something on his mind, he probably doesn't need such a concert anyway, he's swimming in enough presence anyway. But if he's really going to give a concert, it's a shame.

Sometimes I watch street interviews, everyone is whining about their livelihoods, but some of them are confused, but he did this, he said that, he said that, he said, okay, it's expensive, but if he gets it right, he says. In fact, the event is very different, they showed only one moment of the event on the channel he listened to, she believed what was said and shown, and did not research the rest. He didn't even need to research. These are the most dangerous characters. It's not possible, you can't convince them of anything else. You ask how much money you earn, he says three cents, you say eee, how do you make a living, he says Reyis, he doesn't say anything else. Interesting indeed.

Of course, there is a reason for everything that is done, this is understandable, I can guess what the channels that only show a moment are trying to do. Still, people are sad. Believe me, unfortunately.

Some Events Are As They Appear, They Are:

I think we realized that things may not be as they seem or tell us at first. But sometimes things don't happen as they seem. We say valid reason, even if something wrong has been done, it can be acceptable if there is a valid reason.

Then what is this valid reason, I guess it would be useful to learn about it first. Although validity is also a relative concept, valid for you, not for me. However, in order to make the right decision, it would be useful to learn the reason for what was done, otherwise extrajudicial executions.

Now when I was thinking about these, Şener Şen's famous movie came to my mind, Şener Şen was saying in the movie, "I did it, okay I did it, but ask me why I did it". "Banker Bilo" I guess. What good old movies were. They're making good movies now though.

There is also a famous poem Sümbülzade Vehbi Efendi wrote to the sultan. In the first line of each couplet, he hits the sultan from the ground to the ground, and in the second, he takes him to the sky. His master is writing it, anyone who is curious should look on the internet, it would be too much here if I wrote a couple of verses now.

After all, everything in life is not what it seems at first, so I say to everything, at least not to turn our heads so that there is no misunderstanding, let's do it if we are going to examine it a little more deeply and then comment.

For example, I am still thinking, what was the purpose while sitting in the dark, how did the events develop, what was the result? I'm trying to examine it, I think if it helps. It seems to me that they messed it up with misdirection. They couldn't show the right moment. I'm still confused how to understand what.

Everything should be done in its place, it should be completed completely:

I guess there is the other side of this situation, look at ourselves carefully, look again, when we say misunderstanding for nothing, it means that we should have a word with the person in the event, if you do not want them to misunderstand you in conscious things, excluding situations that are out of your control because it suddenly develops. You must do it, you must bring it to an end, leaving it unfinished, behaviors that will cause misunderstandings do not suit the teams that are candidates for the country's administration. What has been done so far is similar to the endings in Güldür Güldür's old sketches. People get excited at first, and when it doesn't end, they have different feelings. It looks like a sack of figs has been spoiled. Even Güldür Güldür has fixed it now, he connects the ending well in his last sketches.

It doesn't just mean it's coming, it's coming, it's necessary to complete what has been started properly, and one must be very careful, the field is very muddy, slippery, full of traps. The fugitive is already wrestling, he is constantly working from below, he likes to be loaded.

It's my sincere criticism.

Love and regards from Moscow.

Araştırmacı Yazar Deniz BURSALIOĞLU
Author Deniz BURSALIOĞLU
All Articles

  • 02.06.2022
  • Time : 3 min
  • 2200 Read

Google Ads