Duel
While cowboy duels were once held in America to ensure justice or to share their trump cards, duels were held in Europe with its own rules until the beginning of the 18th century.
Dueling Tradition:
It once interested me, I did some research on it, I wrote it down. It was rewarding to buy some of them after the latest developments.
While cowboy duels were once held in America to ensure justice or to share their trump cards, duels were held in Europe with its own rules until the beginning of the 18th century.
Aleksander Pushkin, the famous poet and writer of Russia and the founder of Russian modern literature, died in a duel in 1837.
When he finds out that a Frenchman named Aleksander Pushkin d'Anthès (Dante's) is courting his wife, Natalya Goncharova, to seduce him, he challenges the man to a duel, which becomes his life's mistake, and Pushkin dies two days later at the age of 37, injured in his stomach.
I recently watched another movie on the duel. Its name is "The Last Duel", the film is about some events in medieval France, but the main theme is again a matter of honor, again a woman and a happy ending with a duel.
It's a great movie, I recommend it.
At that time, there was not yet a gun, a duel of knights on horseback, with heavy armor, sword, ax, whatever, again in front of the public, even before the king and queen, by the rules of those times, to the death. Like the movie "Gladiator," this is a very bloody movie.
Dueling Tradition Abolished:
So why the abolished duel, it's nice, you don't have to decide who is right and who is wrong, two people should share their trump card among themselves. It is very difficult to decide who is right and who is wrong. It doesn't matter if it's right or wrong, if there's a duel, the survivor is right! God knows the truth and he makes the right decision.
The reason why the duel was abolished, not for the sake of humanity, or the duel that was endangered against the king's authority. He said who is right and who is wrong, I will decide, he said, I will not allow you to settle the enmity between you. Otherwise, if you leave everything to God, what will I be here? He said "I am your god on earth" and canceled the duel.
In the modern world, courts decide now. If there is hostility between two people, if you do not like the decision of the court, or if you think that an unfair decision has been made, you seek justice in a higher court. No, there is a constitutional court. It didn't happen either, the European court of human rights is the last stop. Of course, in states like us that have accepted the European Court of Human Rights.
Political Duel:
In the rest of the article, I actually examined the developments in Russia, the war had not started yet, but it was on the horizon.
Now it's on the agenda again, a little different now, a political duel!
On the one hand, a minister who makes insults by saying words that do not suit his position, on the other hand, a fresh political party chairman who is insulted.
He says I'm coming to your door, he says if you're a man, you'll come to me. He says it will be clear whether you are good or bad.
In recent days, our social unity is under threat again, the issue is the open door policy implemented by the government and all the asylum seekers in Turkey.
People's voices are starting to be heard. Nobody is happy with the situation. Even the very beginning had to change the rhetoric.
On the migration route, Turkey is on its journey to Europe. Those who could not find peace in their own country had set out to establish a life in Europe, which is believed to be a more civilized order, long enough ago.
Now I won't enter into the fear in Europe and the migrant agreement they hastened with Turkey.
I won't go into the effects of wars and those who are in a good mood in the lands beyond the ocean, things we are all familiar with.
The Refugee Problem:
But the result is the rising voices and objections among us. Our door is always open to our compatriots from anywhere in the world, no one has any objection to this. But one cannot approach everyone with the same feelings. To a certain extent, when we do not have a cultural unity with those who come, unrest begins. On the one hand, this situation has great political potential, of course, although it risks being labeled as racist, it gains an advantage in terms of voting for itself, which is the voice of these objections, this is a fact. In any case, Ümit Özdağ knows this too.
The subject has become like Arabian hair, everyone is aware of it. Who knows how it can be solved, it is useful to look at history, it is necessary to examine who has dealt with the great migrations and how. Our own history is also a history of migration, there is definitely a lot to be enlightened about. It is necessary to look at the results of this problem in other countries today. For example, Lebanon collapsed economically, the state declared bankruptcy.
Of course, on the one hand, when we say humanity, human rights, goodwill and aid, the subject is mixed with other things, for some there is an opportunity, opportunism has penetrated to our bones, for smart employers many cheap workers, for some a way to earn big money, what is going on in Syria, the environment. Let me not go into the trades made by taking advantage of the blurriness, I think corruption reaches the knees and sometimes even the dimensions of betrayal, heedlessness and misguidance. Atatürk's Address to the Youth should be read over and over again.
While the risk of demographic change in Turkey's geography is gradually creating great anger in the society, the issue is about to turn into a real survival problem.
If we look at it from the point of view of power, it is called as having the bulgur in hand while going to Dimyat for rice. I wonder what they were thinking while condoning the uncontrolled entry in time. Couldn't they count these days? Maybe they did it on purpose, I no longer understand their intentions for a long time. It has become very difficult to understand what they are trying to transform Turkey into. Sometimes it feels like they're doing useful things because they hold the power, but then I immediately notice that their wobble continues. I am coming to myself. When I said pragmatism, I wrote that it turns bright. It's really hard to understand their true intentions.
One way or another, when all these mistakes are combined with the persistent incompetence of the leaders, the result is obvious. We have a problem like a light ball. Power is aware of it or not, it is the problem of the next decades. For now, the leaders may think they have the situation under control, but they are greatly mistaken. This is not something that can be solved by saying I have the power. Nerves were tense. Of course, nervous nerves also lead to mistakes. Especially when someone saw the right to insult themselves with power poisoning, it turned into a holiday place again, we went to the screen as if we were watching a cowboy movie.
Let's not forget: Duel Forbidden
Now if you're a man, come before me! he said, but will he come out, can he come out, will he come out?
What were you waiting for, scream as much as you can to be a coward, it's been a long time since the duel has been banned, should they leave the decision to God?
The most you can do from now on is to go to court. If that was the goal, though, you'd probably go home. Since he went to the ministry, the matter is different. Then you will say that this is enough for now, you became the agenda anyway, you reached your goal. A goal is a goal, we will look at the next matches. Sorry, this is the second one. There was also the issue of nominations. At the end of the day, Ümit Özdağ seems to be taking firm steps forward.
Anyway, anyone who has a problem will turn to God on earth! Duel is forbidden!
Love and regards from Moscow