Responsibles for the Grand Kartal Disaster
The development of a country is not measured by money, weapons, buildings, roads, facilities, infrastructure, superstructure or technology. The measure of a country's development is that the people living in that country live a pleasant, peaceful and happy long life and die of their own accord.
Turkey has again experienced a great disaster. We are heartbroken. They did not die with their fate, they died before their fate came because of the negligence of those responsible.
So who are those responsible?
Some blame Bolu Municipality, some blame the Ministry of Tourism. The other side is blamed according to their political views. However, the culprit is clear.
The guilty, the people; the guilty, the system.
Why the people? Because;
Peoples who cannot choose their rulers correctly die not by their own deaths, but by negligence. The development of a country is not measured by money, weapons, buildings, roads, facilities, infrastructure, superstructure or technology. The measure of a country's development is that the people living in that country live a pleasant, peaceful and happy long life and die of their own accord.
That is why the people who give political support to local or general administrations, regardless of merit, just because they are close to their own political views and culture, are criminals and unfortunately pay the penalty for this crime by dying untimely.
So why the system?
The system of authorised irresponsibility, which is unique in any country, is the biggest culprit.
In this politically ‘sui generis’, i.e. uniquely created system of governance, the authority of the administration is almost unlimited, while its responsibility is almost non-existent. Those who have no authority are responsible for almost everything. It is a marvellous system not only for politicians but for all managers.
We have seen and experienced examples of irresponsibility in this system in the past.
For example; have we lost martyrs because of the treacherous separatist terrorist organisation, the rulers are of course irresponsible, the PKK, PYD, YPG terrorist organisations and the opposition are responsible. We also found a great word, ‘affiliation’, and when we put it everywhere, the others immediately become responsible.
For example; was there a coup attempt, because of the treacherous FETO terrorist organisation, the rulers are of course irresponsible, the terrorist organisation is responsible and of course the associated opposition.
For example, are the people moaning and groaning due to lack of livelihood, the rulers are of course irresponsible, the foreign powers, the interest lobby and of course the opposition associated with them are responsible.
For example; tens of thousands of people have died as a result of the earthquake, buildings have collapsed, roads have collapsed, airports have become unusable, there are complaints that there was no early intervention, there are criticisms of the zoning amnesty, but the rulers are again and of course irresponsible, the responsible ones are the fateful plan, the cronies and the opposition, which undoubtedly criticises.
Mine disasters, train disasters, flood disasters, forest fires, none of them were blamed on the administrators, but always on others. And now the hotel fire disaster and again no manager is responsible.
Why?
Because this is the system.
In this system of governance, no matter what happens badly, no matter what happens, the opposition, the irresponsible government is responsible; no matter what happens good and successful, no matter what happens, the government, the irresponsible opposition is responsible.
This is the system of authorised irresponsibility.
In all accepted systems of governance in the world, authority is delegated, responsibility is not. In this bizarre system of governance imposed on Turkey, however, irresponsibility is embraced, authority is not delegated, and responsibility is constantly delegated to others.
In short, this system is tailor-made for the rulers. How this strange system, which was introduced into the political literature with the referendum of the Turkish nation, will be shaped in the future will be decided by the Turkish nation with its preference in the upcoming elections.
This decision does not only mean choosing those who will govern themselves. At the same time, this decision will also be the decision of whether the people will be able to reach their own death by their own death.
States that cannot keep their people alive for a long time do not have a long life.
