The Syrian Ceasefire Deception

After the Second World War, the dominant powers, having learned lessons from interventions such as Vietnam and Afghanistan where they themselves entered the conflict zone, began using proxies and puppets whom they made dependent on themselves by providing financial support, weapons and training, in order to shape/secure world politics and economic interests and increase their gains. In this way, the dominant powers created an area they could reject in order to avoid the harsh realities that would be thrown in their faces and the international legal consequences that would follow, thereby minimising the damage they would suffer.

In international relations, no policy is pursued by chance. Every major power has committees based on science that determine policies in line with their own interests, and powerful intelligence structures to implement these policies. These policies do not change from one day to the next, but the means that governments use to achieve these goals may vary. In this context, puppets engaged in proxy wars are positioned according to the strategy of the puppeteer holding their strings. In foreign policy, no pivotal event, protest, or action (including terrorist acts) emerges according to the normal flow of life, nor does it disappear according to the normal flow of life.

Side note: ‘If you want to reveal the perpetrators of an event, you need to carefully analyse and determine who benefited from that event. Whoever benefited is the PERPETRATOR.’

Although domestic policy is related to foreign policy, it is an area I refrain from writing about. I prefer to list and evaluate what needs to be done regarding events occurring around the world from the perspective of international relations and foreign policy, as well as in areas requiring my expertise. However, in this article, it has become necessary to clearly highlight certain focal points for the survival of Turkey.

Having provided this introductory information, I would like to ask and answer a few questions to draw attention to a series of events that closely concern us, our state organs, and the Turkish public, so that our readers can better understand what is happening around us: Is the current government, which took control of Syria within 24 hours after Assad, under the control of Israel/the US? YES. Is another puppet used against ISIS, the YPG/PKK/SDG, under Israeli/US control? The answer is again YES. So, can puppets whose leashes/strings are in the hands of the SAME PUPPETEER move ‘against the PUPPETEER'S will’? NO.

Let us briefly recall the events that have taken place in Syria over the past month, following the example of Iraq, which led to the influx of millions of temporary refugees into our country, Syria, and disrupted our demographic structure.

According to the 10 March 2024 Agreement, the SDG in Syria, equipped and trained by the US, was supposed to be integrated into the Syrian army by the end of 2025. Time ran out, but this requirement of the agreement was not fulfilled; in fact, the SDG made different demands to ‘PRESERVE ITS INTEGRITY’. Thus, as December approached and the memorandum expired, tensions continued to rise between the SDF and the Syrian army (which is not a regular army, as the manpower of the so-called army is entirely made up of HTŞ), and eventually a SO-CALLED conflict was provoked (again, it was the innocent civilians who suffered), and the civilian population in the region fled these conflicts and were driven towards the east. Now, readers may comment that by using the term ‘so-called’ conflict, I am disregarding the people who died there, but these are considered, in American terms, ‘collateral damage,’ meaning that they are accepted as sacrifices that must be made in order to achieve the main goal. At the end of the play, in mid-January 2026, the SDF announced that it would withdraw to the east of the Euphrates, and the Syrian army declared that it would not attack the SDF or fire bullets while this withdrawal was taking place. The fact that the most prominent location of this internal conflict is Aleppo is significant in two respects. Firstly, HTS's ability to capture Damascus depended on the fall of Aleppo, and that is what happened. In other words, if you want to dominate Damascus and, consequently, Syria, Aleppo must be yours. There are many reasons for this; for example, all trade and supply routes in Syria converge on two cities, Aleppo and Damascus. Another reason is that Aleppo is an ancient TURKISH city. It is a city imbued with TURKISH history, from the Seljuk and Mamluk-style Aleppo Grand Mosque, dating back to the 8th century, to the Hüsrev Pasha Complex, designed by the architect Sinan. It is clear to whom the message is being sent, and the aim is to bring the issue to the point where it must be negotiated.

While these events were unfolding in Syria, developments were also taking place in Iran, where the Iranian people, demanding freedom, rose up against the repressive, prohibitive, authoritarian mullah regime and began protests. According to some sources, before the protests began, Salafi ISIS militants held in Syrian prisons were sent to Iran via Iraq to fight in exchange for their freedom, while other sources claim that PKK militants were sent to support the Iranian PKK, PJAK. According to Iran's official statements, over three thousand people have been killed and tens of thousands arrested in the events. Even official figures reveal the magnitude of the events.

Simultaneously with the events in Syria and Iran, certain games have begun to be played in Turkey. In particular, the ‘independent’ media and the DEM party, which is rapidly moving in the opposite direction of becoming a Turkish party, insisted on the podium of the Grand National Assembly that there was a Kurdish massacre in Syria, as if the Syrian government had begun ethnic cleansing against the Kurds, As a result, protest marches organised by separatist terrorist organisations have been held in various provinces and districts of Turkey. Meanwhile, the nationalist faction turned a blind eye to these protests, where separatist banners and slogans were displayed, and began organising raids on publishing houses and conferences. Unfortunately, this “look at the juggler” game worked, and the Turkish people were prevented from seeing and questioning the fire raging around us and its repercussions against Turkey.

The aim of the political extension of the separatist terrorist organisation appears to be to draw attention by rejecting the civilian deaths in Syria on humanitarian grounds. However, why has it remained silent until now about those who threw Molotov cocktails at a municipal bus, burning a young girl alive, or those who raided villages and massacred our citizens, whom they call Kurds, indiscriminately, including children, the elderly, women and even babies in their cradles? In fact, the aim of the political extension of separatist terrorism is to consolidate the young population of Kurds, who are pro-state and particularly fertile, around ‘Kurdish nationalism’. They know that in order to rally people around ethnic nationalism, they need to create HEROES, as a result of the lessons they learned from the CIA on perception management, propaganda and social engineering. However, thanks to the legendary struggle of the Turkish Armed Forces, the separatist terrorist organisation, which had been rendered ineffective on Turkish soil, was sent to Syria primarily to establish the Syrian part of the state they had envisioned, due to the game changers altering the circumstances. Therefore, it is not possible to create heroes within Turkey, so it is necessary to keep ethnic nationalism alive by creating heroes from the struggle in Syria. The protests organised in Turkey are a result of this. In addition, it attempts to compensate for this lack of HEROES through ‘Children Drawn into Crime’. The most concrete evidence for this conclusion is that images of the perpetrators of almost all incidents in which our young people were killed, even if they were not militants of the separatist terrorist organisation, were disseminated via social media as their SYMPATHISERS.

Although all these events spread rapidly across three countries, they suddenly subsided within a very short time. Iran, which had previously declared the protesters terrorists and announced that they would be hanged, suddenly changed its decision and announced that it would not execute the protesters, and the protests and armed clashes ended.

Meanwhile, in Syria, the government issued an eight-point decree granting the SDG more than the 10 March Memorandum;

https://sana.sy/tr/presidency/2278980/

1. The first article states that although the country's name is the Syrian Arab Republic, it has transitioned from a unitary structure to an ETHNIC structure.

2. Articles 2 and 3 state that although Kurdish, the language of the Kurds who make up only about 10% of Syria's population, is recognised as an official language, Turkish, the language used by the Turkmen, who have the second largest population after the Kurds, is not recognised as an official language.

3. The fourth article declares that the Kurds settled east of the Euphrates, along with those displaced by this conflict, will be relocated to the WEST of the Euphrates through a LARGER population migration.

The remaining articles are of no importance. With this decree, the apparent withdrawal of the SDF, making it appear defeated, is actually the success of the SDF's DEMOGRAPHIC occupation of the west of the Euphrates. The strategy is to ask for MORE, take what is NECESSARY, and set your sights on the rest when the conditions are right. Furthermore, the force, which is claimed to number 100,000 but whose disorganisation is evident on the ground, has gained the time it needs for reorganisation without being disturbed by anyone, for the replenishment of its shortage of weapons, ammunition, vehicles, equipment, and communication tools, and for the training required to reach a level where it can conduct coordinated operations.

In fact, since the Syrian government did not come to power through elections and no elections have been held yet, there is a LEGITIMACY issue in terms of international law, no matter what anyone says. However, it should be well known that the 16 January 2026 decree drafted in Syria is the SIGNAL FOR the new constitution to be drafted in Turkey.

Another point I would like to draw your attention to is that when the date was 17 January 2026, the events that began almost simultaneously in these three countries also subsided almost simultaneously. Therefore, this operation has led us to believe that it was managed from the SAME/SINGLE CENTRE.

However, the sequence of events continues in a surprising manner. We will have to wait and see whether US President Donald Trump's invitation to the President of the Republic of Turkey to be a ‘Founding Member’ of the Gaza Peace Council and Israel's almost simultaneous invitation to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey to join the Peace Commission will result in Israel and Turkey, seen as ‘opposite poles’, sitting down at the same table.

Our region is ripe for bloody events…